Mandatory GMO Labeling is Not Good For Anyone

If you have been anywhere around a TV or computer hopefully you have been following the GMO labeling debate. Many states have unfortunately passed legislation to require food companies to label food products that contain ingredients from GMO crops. Some uninformed consumers think this is a good idea. I hear “I want to know what’s in my food” and “we have the right to know what is in our food.” Those are valid arguments and consumers already know what is in their food; product ingredients are already listed on the label in descending order by weight. Adding an additional label that says “This product contains GMO ingredients” will do nothing but harm consumers and farmers alike.

We can all remember years ago when the FDA required that all products begin listing trans fats on their nutrition label. Trans fats were studied for many years and were determined to be potentially harmful and therefore their content needed to be included on the label. Multiple entities have studied GMOs and no study has shown GMOs to be a potential health risk. Therefore, if all products are required to put a GMO content statement on the label it would imply that GMOs are potentially harmful, even though there is no science to prove this idea. This would lead the consumer to think that GMOs are bad for their health like trans fats and they would start thinking about buying “GMO Free” labeled products. One could ask “well if it’s on the label then I need to know about it for a reason.”

Most people probably wonder why cotton farmers and the Georgia Cotton Commission would care if GMOs are labeled or not. Well, cotton is both a food and a fiber crop. Yes, you ate some cotton today. Just check any salad dressing, snack food, fast food, or peanut butter jar label and will see that you’ve consumed cottonseed oil recently. In fact, most peanut butters I’ve seen have cottonseed oil in them. And those red bags of Georgia Peanuts that we eat everyday for a snack, yep they were cooked in cottonseed oil. Therefore the cotton industry has a vested interest in keeping GMO labeling off of the table.

peanutbutterjarpeanutbag1  peanutbag2

What the cotton industry does support, along with over 300 other ag groups, is a voluntary program that gives the FDA sole authority across the US in determining if a product should require a GMO label. This would fix the patchwork of states that have already passed state legislation to label GMOs, which a nightmare for ag companies to comply with. H.R. 1599 was recently introduced in Congress and is supported by many ag groups. The Commission, along with many other groups, signed onto a letter from the Coalition for Safe and Affordable Foods indicating we support a voluntary program that is nationwide that gives the FDA the ability to label GMO products if those products create a health risk.

Here is a brief summary and you can read the support letter here.

Articles of interest:

Saluting Dixon Cotton Gin Manager Jaclyn Ford

Cotton Market: “Fish or Cut Bait” Decision

Mr. Xi, and others, Tear Down These Walls

Cotton Producers Scrambling for Nematicide Replacement

One thought on “Mandatory GMO Labeling is Not Good For Anyone

  1. Pingback: GMOs Increase Cotton Farmer Revenue | Georgia Cotton Commission

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s